This is your cue to exist: On Teleology out of Nothing

Alt Title: Within Without: A Spinoza Gone Wild🤟🏽👺🔮

Existence a reaction we have a part in reacting to.

How can there be a point B if there is no point A? Point B will have to be point A. How can we approach point B from point A if point A is point B?

How can we have a destination without an origin? How can we get our bearings without a stabilizing context and how can the stabilizing context be ourselves rather than a beginning? What does it mean for us to be the answers we search the meaning of?

I’m from the hood, stupid. What kind of facts are those?

Pettiness as a coordination short of idealized expectations, distracted by immediate satisfaction. Point B becomes a demanded point A based on bias, egotistical judgments.

Our encounter with directionless knowledge only makes sense when the knowledge gains a direction. The question is, is the direction/mapping of the knowledge an objective experience that we mold our subjectivity around? Or does our subjectivity impart its own direction on passive knowledge in an emulsifying triage “towards” objectivity?